Keneaster v. Vickers

Indiana Supreme Court

Keneaster v. Vickers

32 Ind. 492

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1870

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 Ind. 492 (Keneaster v. Vickers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keneaster v. Vickers, 32 Ind. 492 (Ind. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

Erazer, J.

This case is before us upon the evidence, which was very conflicting, the finding upon the issues depending much upon the credit due to the witnesses. It is, therefore, peculiarly a case in which this court cannot disturb the finding. Indeed, we are not prepared to say that [493]*493the weight of the evidence does not appear to sustain that finding.

J. E. McDonald, A. L. JRoache, E. M. McDonald, and «T. W. Mchol, for appellant. A. Gr. Porter, B. Harrison, and W. P. Fishback, for appellee.

Affirmed, with five per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erazer, J.

This case is before us upon the evidence, which was very conflicting, the finding upon the issues depending much upon the credit due to the witnesses. It is, therefore, peculiarly a case in which this court cannot disturb the finding. Indeed, we are not prepared to say that [493]*493the weight of the evidence does not appear to sustain that finding.

J. E. McDonald, A. L. JRoache, E. M. McDonald, and «T. W. Mchol, for appellant. A. Gr. Porter, B. Harrison, and W. P. Fishback, for appellee.

Affirmed, with five per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Ind. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keneaster-v-vickers-ind-1870.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack