Kendzierski v. Macomb Cnty.

Michigan Supreme Court

Kendzierski v. Macomb Cnty.

922 N.W.2d 339

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 1, 2019

DocketSC: 156086; COA: 329576

StatusPublished

This text of 922 N.W.2d 339 (Kendzierski v. Macomb Cnty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kendzierski v. Macomb Cnty., 922 N.W.2d 339 (Mich. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon de novo review by the entire Court in accordance with MCR 2.003(D)(2)(b), the Court orders that the motion of plaintiffs-appellees to disqualify Justice David F. Viviano from participating in the decision of this case is DENIED for the reason that no justice is persuaded that there is any ground for the disqualification of Justice Viviano.

VIVIANO , J., did not participate in the decision because he is the subject of the disqualification motion.

CAVANAGH , J., is not participating in the case, including the motion to disqualify, because the case was argued before she assumed office.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon de novo review by the entire Court in accordance with MCR 2.003(D)(2)(b), the Court orders that the motion of plaintiffs-appellees to disqualify Justice David F. Viviano from participating in the decision of this case is DENIED for the reason that no justice is persuaded that there is any ground for the disqualification of Justice Viviano.

VIVIANO , J., did not participate in the decision because he is the subject of the disqualification motion.

CAVANAGH , J., is not participating in the case, including the motion to disqualify, because the case was argued before she assumed office.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

922 N.W.2d 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendzierski-v-macomb-cnty-mich-2019.