Kendzierski ex rel. Situated v. Macomb Cnty.

911 N.W.2d 806
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 1, 2018
DocketSC: 156086; COA: 329576
StatusPublished

This text of 911 N.W.2d 806 (Kendzierski ex rel. Situated v. Macomb Cnty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kendzierski ex rel. Situated v. Macomb Cnty., 911 N.W.2d 806 (Mich. 2018).

Opinion

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to file a reply to the brief amicus curiae submitted by the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, and American Federation of Teachers Michigan, ADL-CIO, is GRANTED. The reply submitted on May 29, 2018, is accepted for filing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
911 N.W.2d 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendzierski-ex-rel-situated-v-macomb-cnty-mich-2018.