Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Kendricks v. State

Kendricks v. State

884 So. 2d 138, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10459, 2004 WL 1562065
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 14, 2004
DocketNo. 2D04-95
StatusPublished

This text of 884 So. 2d 138 (Kendricks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kendricks v. State, 884 So. 2d 138, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10459, 2004 WL 1562065 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

CASANUEVA, Judge.

We affirm without prejudice to Ken-dricks’ right to refile his motion for post-conviction relief with proper oath. Since it appears that the two-year time limit for Kendricks to file a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 has expired, Kendricks shall have thirty days from the date of the mandate following this opinion to file a corrected motion and memorandum of law. See Pavey v. State, 720 So.2d 563 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Affirmed without prejudice.

FULMER and STRINGER, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pavey v. State
720 So. 2d 563 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 So. 2d 138, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10459, 2004 WL 1562065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendricks-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.