Kendricks v. State

535 So. 2d 354, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 6652, 1988 WL 142739
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 21, 1988·No. No. 87-1278·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The mandate heretofore issued in this case is withdrawn and appellant’s motion for an extension of time within which to file a motion for rehearing is granted.

The sole issue raised on appeal was that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for arrest of judgment. The motion for arrest of judgment was not timely filed. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

BOOTH, SHIVERS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kendricks v. State, 535 So. 2d 354, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 6652, 1988 WL 142739 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

535 So. 2d 354 (Kendricks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. State
535 So. 2d 354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)