Kendrick v. State
Opinion
Defendant was charged, via uniform traffic citation, with driving under the influence of alcohol. Defendant pleaded guilty and was sentenced to perform 240 hours of community service and to pay a $1,224 fine. This appeal followed. Held:
Defendant contends that publication of his conviction and photograph in the legal organ of the county of his residence pursuant to OCGA § 40-6-391 (j) (1) is an ex post facto application of the law since OCGA § 40-6-391 (j) (1) was not effective at the time of the alleged offense.1
The record in the case sub judice does not reveal that defendant’s sentence included instructions for the clerk of the court in which defendant was convicted to publish a notice of defendant’s conviction and photograph in the legal organ of the county of defendant’s residence pursuant to OCGA § 40-6-391 (j) (!)• Consequently, there is nothing for review.
Judgment affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
413 S.E.2d 785 (Kendrick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.