Kendrick v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Kendrick v. State

136 S.E. 832, 36 Ga. App. 283, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 19

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 11, 1927

Docket17730

StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E. 832 (Kendrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kendrick v. State, 136 S.E. 832, 36 Ga. App. 283, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 19 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant’s conviction of knowingly permitting distilling apparatus to be located on his premises was authorized by the evidence; no error of law was committed on the trial; and the motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds only, was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. James L. Dowling, for plaintiff in error. Clifford E. Hay, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant’s conviction of knowingly permitting distilling apparatus to be located on his premises was authorized by the evidence; no error of law was committed on the trial; and the motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds only, was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. James L. Dowling, for plaintiff in error. Clifford E. Hay, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.E. 832, 36 Ga. App. 283, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendrick-v-state-gactapp-1927.