Kendrick v. State
112 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 677
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kendrick v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Ala. App. 5 →
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law. There is not sufficient evidence in this case to support the verdict of the jury. The court- should have granted the motion for a new trial. The judgment of conviction must be reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kendrick v. State, 112 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 677 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).
112 So. 923 (Kendrick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.