Kendrick v. State
112 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 677
This text of 112 So. 923 (Kendrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kendrick v. State, 112 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 677 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law. There is not sufficient evidence in this case to support the verdict of the jury. The court- should have granted the motion for a new trial. The judgment of conviction must be reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
112 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendrick-v-state-alactapp-1927.