Kendrick v. State
This text of 120 So. 144 (Kendrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William J. Kendrick was convicted of practicing law without license, and appealed to the Court of Appeals (120 So. 140), and the judgment being there affirmed, defendant (appellant) applied to the Supreme Court for writ of error to review said decision by the Court of Appeals. ’ On said writ of error the judgment of the Court of Appeals being reversed (Kendrick v. State, 120 So. 142 1 ), said Court of Appeals entered judgment reversing the judgment of conviction, and the state now applies for certiorari to review and revise the said judgment and de-
*280 cisión of the Court of Appeals in Kendrick v. State, 120 So. 140.
,' Writ denied.
Ante, p. 277.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 So. 144, 218 Ala. 279, 1929 Ala. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendrick-v-state-ala-1929.