Kendrick v. New York State Department of Correctional Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kendrick v. New York State Department of Correctional Service

88 A.D.3d 881, 931 N.Y.2d 255

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[882] Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report, the testimony adduced at the Tier III disciplinary hearing, and the “Contraband Drug Testing Directive” regarding narcotics identification kits and the testing procedures for contraband provided substantial evidence to support the hearing officer’s determination that the petitioner possessed an unauthorized type of medication in violation of 7 NYCRR 270.2 (B) (14) (iv) (see Matter of Mills v Fischer, 85 AD3d 1033 [2011]; Matter of Maxwell v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1342, 1343 [2010]; Matter of Brown v Selsky, 38 AD3d 657 [2007]; Matter of Rincon v Selsky, 28 AD3d 565 [2006]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.E, Florio, Eng and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[882] Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report, the testimony adduced at the Tier III disciplinary hearing, and the “Contraband Drug Testing Directive” regarding narcotics identification kits and the testing procedures for contraband provided substantial evidence to support the hearing officer’s determination that the petitioner possessed an unauthorized type of medication in violation of 7 NYCRR 270.2 (B) (14) (iv) (see Matter of Mills v Fischer, 85 AD3d 1033 [2011]; Matter of Maxwell v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1342, 1343 [2010]; Matter of Brown v Selsky, 38 AD3d 657 [2007]; Matter of Rincon v Selsky, 28 AD3d 565 [2006]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.E, Florio, Eng and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Kendrick v. New York State Department of Correctional Service, 88 A.D.3d 881, 931 N.Y.2d 255 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

88 A.D.3d 881 (Kendrick v. New York State Department of Correctional Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related