Kendrick v. Battle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Kendrick v. Battle

101 S.E. 812, 24 Ga. App. 676, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 448

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 7, 1920

Docket10829

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 S.E. 812 (Kendrick v. Battle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kendrick v. Battle, 101 S.E. 812, 24 Ga. App. 676, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 448 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Where a remittitur from this court is made the judgment of the lower court, the latter court can not render another judgment against the sureties upon a supersedeas bond for a sum of money additional to the amount of the original judgment. In this case the court did not err in sustaining, upon the evidence offered, the affidavit of illegality. See Corbin v. McCrary, 23 Ga. App. 780 (96 S. E. 445.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Blood/worth, J., concur.

Affidavit of illegality; from Taliaferro superior court—Judge Walker. June 26, 1919.

James A. Mitchell, Alvin G. Golucke, for plaintiff. Hawes Cloud, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI