Kendrick Dwayne Walker v. State
This text of Kendrick Dwayne Walker v. State (Kendrick Dwayne Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion Denied and Dissent to Order filed March 5, 2019.
In the
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-18-00601-CR
KENDRICK DWAYNE WALKER, Appellant
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 208th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1540170
DISSENT TO DENIAL OF MOTION TO ABATE THE APPEAL AND REMAND THE CASE FOR A HEARING ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
Because appellant’s motion for new trial raises issues which are not determinable from the record, I would grant appellant’s motion to abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial so that appellant has meaningful appellate review. See Smith v. State, 286 S.W.3d 333, 338 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Hemphill v. State, No. 14-13-00395-CR, 2015 WL 1456338, at *5–*10 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Mar. 26, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
Accordingly, I dissent from the denial of appellant’s motion to abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial.
/s/ Charles A. Spain Justice
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain (J. Spain, dissenting). Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kendrick Dwayne Walker v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendrick-dwayne-walker-v-state-texapp-2019.