Kendle v. Town of Amsterdam

866 N.E.2d 1043, 8 N.Y.3d 940, 834 N.Y.S.2d 714, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 871
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 26, 2007
StatusPublished

This text of 866 N.E.2d 1043 (Kendle v. Town of Amsterdam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kendle v. Town of Amsterdam, 866 N.E.2d 1043, 8 N.Y.3d 940, 834 N.Y.S.2d 714, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 871 (N.Y. 2007).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain this motion for leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order where the appeal to the Appellate Division was from a County Court order entered on an appeal in this action commenced in the City Court of the City of Amsterdam (see NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [7]; CPLR 5602 [a]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 5602
New York CVP § 5602

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 N.E.2d 1043, 8 N.Y.3d 940, 834 N.Y.S.2d 714, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendle-v-town-of-amsterdam-ny-2007.