Kendle v. Town of Amsterdam

866 N.E.2d 1043, 8 N.Y.3d 940, 834 N.Y.S.2d 714, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 871
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 26, 2007·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain this motion for leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order where the appeal to the Appellate Division was from a County Court order entered on an appeal in this action commenced in the City Court of the City of Amsterdam (see NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [7]; CPLR 5602 [a]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kendle v. Town of Amsterdam, 866 N.E.2d 1043, 8 N.Y.3d 940, 834 N.Y.S.2d 714, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 871 (N.Y. 2007).

866 N.E.2d 1043 (Kendle v. Town of Amsterdam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 5602
New York CVP § 5602