Kendig v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kendig v. Roberts

40 A. 1022, 187 Pa. 339, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 813

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 21, 1898

DocketAppeal, No. 3

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 40 A. 1022 (Kendig v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kendig v. Roberts, 40 A. 1022, 187 Pa. 339, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 813 (Pa. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

This case was ably and correctly tried. Our consideration of the record, with special reference to each of the specifications, has satisfied us that neither of them can be sustained. All that can be profitably said in relation to either of the questions involved is contained in the opinion of the learned trial judge refusing the motion for new trial and directing judgment on the •verdict.

For reasons there given the specifications are overruled and judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam,

This case was ably and correctly tried. Our consideration of the record, with special reference to each of the specifications, has satisfied us that neither of them can be sustained. All that can be profitably said in relation to either of the questions involved is contained in the opinion of the learned trial judge refusing the motion for new trial and directing judgment on the •verdict.

For reasons there given the specifications are overruled and judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A. 1022, 187 Pa. 339, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendig-v-roberts-pa-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack