Kendig v. Kendall Construction Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kendig v. Kendall Construction Co.

294 So. 2d 709, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7295

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 24, 1974·No. No. 74-300·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the record in this cause and in light of enactment of Chapter 73-124, Laws of Florida (Section 501.201-501.213, 570.283 Florida Statutes, F.S.A.) we are of the opinion that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. See also Rule 2-11.07, 1 Fla.Administrative Code 22. Accordingly, the order of the trial court dated March 1, 1974 is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings with the respectful request for the trial court to reconsider the denial of plaintiff’s motion to consolidate in light of the decision herein.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the record in this cause and in light of enactment of Chapter 73-124, Laws of Florida (Section 501.201-501.213, 570.283 Florida Statutes, F.S.A.) we are of the opinion that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. See also Rule 2-11.07, 1 Fla.Administrative Code 22. Accordingly, the order of the trial court dated March 1, 1974 is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings with the respectful request for the trial court to reconsider the denial of plaintiff’s motion to consolidate in light of the decision herein.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Kendig v. Kendall Construction Co., 294 So. 2d 709, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7295 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

294 So. 2d 709 (Kendig v. Kendall Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related