Home/Supreme Court of Vermont/Kendall v. Springer

Kendall v. Springer

300 A.2d 629, 131 Vt. 47, 1973 Vt. LEXIS 264
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJanuary 5, 1973
DocketNo. 3-72
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 300 A.2d 629 (Kendall v. Springer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kendall v. Springer, 300 A.2d 629, 131 Vt. 47, 1973 Vt. LEXIS 264 (Vt. 1973).

Opinion

Daley, J.

This is a petition for extraordinary relief raising the identical issues presented in the case of Donald Joseph Veilleux v. Honorable Lewis E. Springer, Jr., George P. Stokes, and James E. Malloy, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, decided at this Term of Court. The cases were argued together. The disposition of that case governs this.

The order of the District Court in this cause is set aside and the plaintiff shall not be required to surrender his motor vehicle operator’s license for the purpose of suspension as provided in 23 T.S.A. § 1205 as ordered by the court.

Chief Justice Shangraw and Mr. Justice Barney dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aronstam v. Cashman
325 A.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
300 A.2d 629, 131 Vt. 47, 1973 Vt. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendall-v-springer-vt-1973.