Kendall v. Pilkington
731 A.2d 307, 248 Conn. 909, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 110
This text of 731 A.2d 307 (Kendall v. Pilkington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kendall v. Pilkington, 731 A.2d 307, 248 Conn. 909, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 110 (Colo. 1999).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 18736) is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly grant the plaintiff s motion to dismiss, which asserted that the defendant was in contempt of court, notwithstanding that the defendant appealed from one of the trial court’s findings of contempt, had purged himself of the other findings of contempt and despite the fact that the trial court vacated its last finding of contempt thereby mooting the issues raised in the motion to dismiss?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kendall v. Pilkington
750 A.2d 1090 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
731 A.2d 307, 248 Conn. 909, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendall-v-pilkington-conn-1999.