Kendall v. Pilkington

731 A.2d 307, 248 Conn. 909, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 110
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 17, 1999·No. SC 16082·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 18736) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly grant the plaintiff s motion to dismiss, which asserted that the defendant was in contempt of court, notwithstanding that the defendant appealed from one of the trial court’s findings of contempt, had purged himself of the other findings of contempt and despite the fact that the trial court vacated its last finding of contempt thereby mooting the issues raised in the motion to dismiss?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kendall v. Pilkington, 731 A.2d 307, 248 Conn. 909, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 110 (Colo. 1999).

731 A.2d 307 (Kendall v. Pilkington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kendall v. Pilkington
750 A.2d 1090 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)