Kendall v. Goodson

96 S.E. 343, 22 Ga. App. 491, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 568
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 10, 1918·No. 9635·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bboyles, P. J.

1. In an action for’damages for malicious prosecution, where the petition alleges that the prosecution was without probable cause, allegations showing that the defendant appeared before the grand jury as a witness and succeeded in getting a true bill returned against the petitioner, on an indictment drawn by the solicitor-general of the circuit, do not render the petition subject to general demurrer, when it does not appear that the defendant made to the solicitor-general a fair, 'truthful, and complete statement of the facts connecting the petitioner with the alleged criminal offenses. Hicks v. Brantley, 102 Ga. 264, 273 (29 S. E. 459). See also Clark v. Douglas, 6 Ga. App. 489 (65 S. E. 304).

2. Under the foregoing ruling the court did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kendall v. Goodson, 96 S.E. 343, 22 Ga. App. 491, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 568 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

96 S.E. 343 (Kendall v. Goodson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stokes v. State
2 S.E.2d 674 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Hearn v. Batchelor
170 S.E. 203 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)