ORDER
JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, United States District Judge
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant Genworth Life Insurance Company’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. 11), which Plaintiff opposes (Dkt. 14). Upon consideration, the Motion is GRANTED. The facility in which Betty Kendall resided was not “licensed by the appropriate licensing agency to engage primarily- in providing nursing care and related services to inpatients” and therefore does not constitute a “nursing home” under the terms of the Policy.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1991, Betty Kendall purchased a Long Term Care Policy (the “Policy”) from AMEX.1 (Dkt. 2 ¶ 6). The Policy provides for benefits to Mrs. Kendall for as long as she is required to be a resident of a “nursing home.” (Id. ¶ 14, Ex. A at 7). The Policy defines “nursing home” as:
A facility or distinctly separate part of a hospital or other institution which is licensed by the appropriate licensing agency to engage primarily in providing nursing care and related services to inpatients and:
• Provides 24 hour a day nursing services under a planned program of policies and procedures which was development with the advice of, and is periodically review and executed by, a professional group of at least one physician and one Nurse; and
• Has a Doctor available to furnish medical care in case of emergency; and
• Has at least one Nurse who is employed there full time (or at least 24 hours per week if the facility has less than 10 beds); and
• Has a Nurse on duty or on call at all times; and
• Maintains clinical records for all patients; and
• Has appropriate methods and procedures for handling and administering drugs and biologicals.
NOTE: The above requirements are typically met by licensed skilled nursing facilities and intermediate nursing care facilities as well as . some specialized wards, wings and units of hospitals. Those requirements are generally NOT met by: rest homes, homes for the aged; sheltered living accommodations; residence homes; or similar living arrangements.
(Dkt. 2, Ex. A at 6; Dkt. 11-1 at 7).
In April 2011, Mrs. Kendall was admitted to Belvedere Commons of Sun City Center (“Belvedere”), licensed by the State of Florida as an assisted living facility. (Id. ¶¶ 10, 17). Mrs. Kendall’s son, who holds her power of attorney, made a claim for benefits under the Policy. (Id. ¶¶ 3,11). Defendant denied that claim, concluding that Belvedere did not meet the definition of a “nursing home” under the Policy. (Id. ¶ 13). Plaintiff brings this breach of contract action arising out of Defendant’s de[1292]*1292nial of Plaintiffs claim for benefits related to Mrs. Kendall’s nursing home stay.
II. STANDARD
“Judgment on the pleadings is appropriate where there are no material facts in dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Cannon v. City of W. Palm Beach, 250 F.3d 1299, 1301 (11th Cir.2011). All material facts alleged in the non-moving party’s pleadings are accepted as true, and those facts are viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Perez v. Wells Fargo N.A., 774 F.3d 1329, 1335 (11th Cir.2014).
III. DISCUSSION
Defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings based on its contention that Belvedere does not meet the definition of a “nursing home” under the Policy because it is not “licensed by the appropriate licensing agency to engage primarily in providing nursing care and related services.” Plaintiff argues that the term “nursing care” in the Policy’s definition of nursing home is not defined and therefore is ambiguous and that the Policy does not require the facility to be licensed as a nursing home.
“The court must enforce the insurance policy as written if the terms are unambiguous.... ” Safeway Insurance Co. v. Herrera, 912 So.2d 1140, 1143 (Ala. 2005).2 “Whether a provision of an insurance policy is ambiguous is a question of law.” Id. “If a word or phrase is not defined' in the policy, then the court should construe the word or phrase according to the meaning a person of ordinary intelligence would reasonably give it.” Id. That is, “[w]hen analyzing an insurance policy, a court gives words used in the policy their common, everyday meaning and interprets them as a reasonable person in the insured’s position would have understood them.” State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Brown, 26 So.3d 1167, 1169 (Ala.2009).
“A term is ambiguous only if, applying the ordinary meaning, one would conclude that the provision containing the term is reasonably susceptible to two or more constructions.” Herrera, 912 So.2d at 1144 (internal quotes omitted). “To the extent the language of an insurance policy provision is ambiguous, all ambiguities must be resolved against the insurance company.” Id. at 1143.
It is undisputed that Belvedere is licensed “by the appropriate licensing agency” as a standard assisted living facility, not as a nursing home. Although the Policy does not define “nursing care or related services,” as used in the Policy’s definition of a nursing home, it is not ambiguous. According to the plain meaning of the Policy’s definition of nursing home, the facility must be licensed to primarily provide nursing care. And in addition to the license requirement, the Policy lists certain services that, at a minimum, the facility must provide. Other courts that have reviewed identical policy language agree that the definition is not ambiguous. See Milburn v. Life Inv’rs Ins. Co. of Am., 511 F.3d 1285, 1288 (10th Cir.2008); Gillogly v. Gen. Elec. Capital Assur. Co., 430 F.3d 1284, 1293 (10th Cir.2005); Geary v. Life Inv’rs Ins. Co. of Am., 508 F.Supp.2d 518, 523 (N.D.Tex.2007); Gregg ex rel Gregg v. IDS Life Ins. Co. of New York, 178 Misc.2d 895, 899, 681 N.Y.S.2d 451, 454 (1998), aff’d, 261 A.D.2d 799, 692 N.Y.S.2d 182 (1999).
[1293]*1293Moreover, Florida law distinguishes between assisted living facilities and nursing homes.3 A nursing home is defined as: “[A]ny facility which provides nursing services as defined in part I of chapter 464 and which is licensed according to this part.”4 Fla. Stat. 400.021(12). On the other hand, an assisted living facility is defined as:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ORDER
JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, United States District Judge
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant Genworth Life Insurance Company’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. 11), which Plaintiff opposes (Dkt. 14). Upon consideration, the Motion is GRANTED. The facility in which Betty Kendall resided was not “licensed by the appropriate licensing agency to engage primarily- in providing nursing care and related services to inpatients” and therefore does not constitute a “nursing home” under the terms of the Policy.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1991, Betty Kendall purchased a Long Term Care Policy (the “Policy”) from AMEX.1 (Dkt. 2 ¶ 6). The Policy provides for benefits to Mrs. Kendall for as long as she is required to be a resident of a “nursing home.” (Id. ¶ 14, Ex. A at 7). The Policy defines “nursing home” as:
A facility or distinctly separate part of a hospital or other institution which is licensed by the appropriate licensing agency to engage primarily in providing nursing care and related services to inpatients and:
• Provides 24 hour a day nursing services under a planned program of policies and procedures which was development with the advice of, and is periodically review and executed by, a professional group of at least one physician and one Nurse; and
• Has a Doctor available to furnish medical care in case of emergency; and
• Has at least one Nurse who is employed there full time (or at least 24 hours per week if the facility has less than 10 beds); and
• Has a Nurse on duty or on call at all times; and
• Maintains clinical records for all patients; and
• Has appropriate methods and procedures for handling and administering drugs and biologicals.
NOTE: The above requirements are typically met by licensed skilled nursing facilities and intermediate nursing care facilities as well as . some specialized wards, wings and units of hospitals. Those requirements are generally NOT met by: rest homes, homes for the aged; sheltered living accommodations; residence homes; or similar living arrangements.
(Dkt. 2, Ex. A at 6; Dkt. 11-1 at 7).
In April 2011, Mrs. Kendall was admitted to Belvedere Commons of Sun City Center (“Belvedere”), licensed by the State of Florida as an assisted living facility. (Id. ¶¶ 10, 17). Mrs. Kendall’s son, who holds her power of attorney, made a claim for benefits under the Policy. (Id. ¶¶ 3,11). Defendant denied that claim, concluding that Belvedere did not meet the definition of a “nursing home” under the Policy. (Id. ¶ 13). Plaintiff brings this breach of contract action arising out of Defendant’s de[1292]*1292nial of Plaintiffs claim for benefits related to Mrs. Kendall’s nursing home stay.
II. STANDARD
“Judgment on the pleadings is appropriate where there are no material facts in dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Cannon v. City of W. Palm Beach, 250 F.3d 1299, 1301 (11th Cir.2011). All material facts alleged in the non-moving party’s pleadings are accepted as true, and those facts are viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Perez v. Wells Fargo N.A., 774 F.3d 1329, 1335 (11th Cir.2014).
III. DISCUSSION
Defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings based on its contention that Belvedere does not meet the definition of a “nursing home” under the Policy because it is not “licensed by the appropriate licensing agency to engage primarily in providing nursing care and related services.” Plaintiff argues that the term “nursing care” in the Policy’s definition of nursing home is not defined and therefore is ambiguous and that the Policy does not require the facility to be licensed as a nursing home.
“The court must enforce the insurance policy as written if the terms are unambiguous.... ” Safeway Insurance Co. v. Herrera, 912 So.2d 1140, 1143 (Ala. 2005).2 “Whether a provision of an insurance policy is ambiguous is a question of law.” Id. “If a word or phrase is not defined' in the policy, then the court should construe the word or phrase according to the meaning a person of ordinary intelligence would reasonably give it.” Id. That is, “[w]hen analyzing an insurance policy, a court gives words used in the policy their common, everyday meaning and interprets them as a reasonable person in the insured’s position would have understood them.” State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Brown, 26 So.3d 1167, 1169 (Ala.2009).
“A term is ambiguous only if, applying the ordinary meaning, one would conclude that the provision containing the term is reasonably susceptible to two or more constructions.” Herrera, 912 So.2d at 1144 (internal quotes omitted). “To the extent the language of an insurance policy provision is ambiguous, all ambiguities must be resolved against the insurance company.” Id. at 1143.
It is undisputed that Belvedere is licensed “by the appropriate licensing agency” as a standard assisted living facility, not as a nursing home. Although the Policy does not define “nursing care or related services,” as used in the Policy’s definition of a nursing home, it is not ambiguous. According to the plain meaning of the Policy’s definition of nursing home, the facility must be licensed to primarily provide nursing care. And in addition to the license requirement, the Policy lists certain services that, at a minimum, the facility must provide. Other courts that have reviewed identical policy language agree that the definition is not ambiguous. See Milburn v. Life Inv’rs Ins. Co. of Am., 511 F.3d 1285, 1288 (10th Cir.2008); Gillogly v. Gen. Elec. Capital Assur. Co., 430 F.3d 1284, 1293 (10th Cir.2005); Geary v. Life Inv’rs Ins. Co. of Am., 508 F.Supp.2d 518, 523 (N.D.Tex.2007); Gregg ex rel Gregg v. IDS Life Ins. Co. of New York, 178 Misc.2d 895, 899, 681 N.Y.S.2d 451, 454 (1998), aff’d, 261 A.D.2d 799, 692 N.Y.S.2d 182 (1999).
[1293]*1293Moreover, Florida law distinguishes between assisted living facilities and nursing homes.3 A nursing home is defined as: “[A]ny facility which provides nursing services as defined in part I of chapter 464 and which is licensed according to this part.”4 Fla. Stat. 400.021(12). On the other hand, an assisted living facility is defined as:
[A]ny building or buildings, section or distinct part of a building, private home, boarding home, home for the aged, or other residential facility, whether operated for profit or not, which undertakes through its ownership or management to provide housing, meals, and one or more personal services for a period exceeding 24 hours to one or more adults who are not relatives of the owner or administrator.5
Fla. Stat. § 429.02(5).
That an assisted living facility holding a standard license “may also employ or contract with a person licensed under part I of chapter 464 to administer medications and perform other tasks as specified in s. 429.255, Fla. Stat. § 429.07(3)(a), does not satisfy the Policy’s first requirement that the facility be licensed to engage primarily in providing nursing care. And the legislature expressly recognizes “that assisted living facilities should be operated and regulated as residential environments with supportive services and not as medical or nursing facilities,” further distinguishing a nursing facility/home from an assisted living facility.6 Fla. Stat. § 429.01.
Accordingly, Defendant Genworth Life Insurance Company’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. 11) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant Genworth Life Insurance Company and against Plaintiff. Keith Kendall and CLOSE the file.
DONE AND ORDERED, this 22^ day of June, -2016.