Kendall v. Ewert

260 U.S. 703, 43 S. Ct. 166, 67 L. Ed. 472, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2412

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kendall v. Ewert. Read the opinion of the Court — 259 U.S. 139 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 27, 1922·No. No. 157·Published

Opinion

Motion as to (1) withdrawal of original paper of notice [704]*704of dismissal of counsel, dated December 31, 1921, denied. Motion as to (2) original deed of July 5, 1918,. from George Redeagle to Paul A. Ewert and as to (3) original deeds of November 19, November 21, and December 21, 1921, from the heirs of George Redeagle to Paul A. Ewert, granted, the copies of said deeds on file to remain with the Clerk.

Mr. Arthur S. Thompson for appellants. Mr. William R. Andrews, Mr. Henry C. Lewis and Mr. Paul A. Ewert for appellee. [See 259 U. S. 139.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Arthur S. Thompson for appellants. Mr. William R. Andrews, Mr. Henry C. Lewis and Mr. Paul A. Ewert for appellee. [See 259 U. S. 139.]

Kendall v. Ewert, 260 U.S. 703, 43 S. Ct. 166, 67 L. Ed. 472, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2412 (1922).

Pincite

260 U.S. 703 (Kendall v. Ewert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Kendall v. Ewert

259 U.S. 139 (Supreme Court, 1922)

Opinion

Related