Kendall v. Board of Education
This text of 1 McGrath 1647 (Kendall v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To compel respondent to x-escind its action in adopting a text book.
Petition demurred to. The circuit judge sustained the demurrer. Affirmed October 22, 1896, with costs.
The rules of the board provide that no text book shall be adopted which has not been proposed at a regular meeting at least one month previous to its adoption. In January, 1895, a member of the board gave notice that he would at some future time present said text book. It was afterwards presented and refereed to a committee who reported August 3, 1895, recommending the adoption of the book. A motion was made to lay [1649]*1649the report on. the table — yeas 6, nays 15. A motion to adopt resulted in 13 yeas and 8 nays.
Relator contended that the board was, undér the statute, compelled to adopt rules, with reference to change of text books, and that the rule referred to was violated.
It appeared, however, that one of the rules provided that any rule may be suspended by a vote of two-thirds of all the members present, and the court held that by the vote had upon the motion to lay upon the table the rule requiring the lapse of thirty •days was suspended.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 1647, 106 McGrath 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendall-v-board-of-education-mich-1896.