Kendall Shive v. Shirley T. Stinson, Arland Stinson, and Patricia Sunbury
Opinion
Opinion issued January 28, 2021
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00301-CV ——————————— KENDALL SHIVE, Appellant V. SHIRLEY T. STINSON, Appellee
On Appeal from the 335th District Court Bastrop County, Texas1 Trial Court Case No. 499-335
MEMORANDUM OPINION
1 Pursuant to its docket equalization authority, the Supreme Court of Texas transferred this appeal to this Court. See Misc. Docket No. 20–9048 (Tex. Mar. 31, 2020); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (authorizing transfer of cases). On March 17, 2020, appellant, Kendall Shive, filed a notice of appeal of the
trial court’s December 18, 2019 order granting appellee, Shirley T. Stinson,
summary judgment. On July 7, 2020, this appeal was abated, at appellant’s request,
to allow the parties an opportunity to finalize the terms of a settlement agreement.
The parties, representing that they have reached such an agreement, have filed
a joint motion to reinstate the appeal and for disposition in accordance with the terms
of the agreement. The motion requests that we reinstate the appeal, vacate the trial
court’s December 18, 2019 order, dismiss the case in its entirety, order that all costs
on appeal be taxed against the parties who incurred the same, and order that this
Court’s mandate issue immediately. No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(c).
Accordingly, we grant the parties’ motion, reinstate the appeal, vacate the trial
court’s December 18, 2019 order, and dismiss the case. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(a)(2)(A), 43.2(e); see e.g., Jester Venture Ltd. v. Nash, No. 01-06-00512-CV,
2006 WL 2042358, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] July 17, 2006, no pet.)
(mem. op.) (vacating trial court’s judgment and dismissing case on parties’ agreed
motion). We direct the Clerk of this Court that costs are to be taxed against the party
who incurred the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). We further direct the Clerk of
this Court to issue the mandate immediately. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1(c). We
dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Countiss, and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kendall Shive v. Shirley T. Stinson, Arland Stinson, and Patricia Sunbury (Kendall Shive v. Shirley T. Stinson, Arland Stinson, and Patricia Sunbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.