Kendall H. Breedlove v. James R. Hart Calvin W. Phillips

Fourth Circuit

Kendall H. Breedlove v. James R. Hart Calvin W. Phillips

57 F.3d 1065, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21789

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 19, 1995

Docket20-1263

StatusPublished

This text of 57 F.3d 1065 (Kendall H. Breedlove v. James R. Hart Calvin W. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kendall H. Breedlove v. James R. Hart Calvin W. Phillips, 57 F.3d 1065, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21789 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

57 F.3d 1065
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kendall H. BREEDLOVE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James R. HART; Calvin W. Phillips, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-1071.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: June 19, 1995.

Kendall H. Breedlove, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) for failure to serve Defendants within 120 days after commencing his action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Breedlove v. Hart, No. CA-94-848-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We deny Appellant's motions to amend the case caption, to publish the opinion, to certify the case to the Attorney General of Virginia under Fed. R.App. P. 44, to vacate a prior order from this Court, and to object to the admissibility of a docket sheet into evidence

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

57 F.3d 1065
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kendall H. BREEDLOVE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James R. HART; Calvin W. Phillips, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-1071.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: June 19, 1995.

Kendall H. Breedlove, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) for failure to serve Defendants within 120 days after commencing his action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Breedlove v. Hart, No. CA-94-848-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We deny Appellant's motions to amend the case caption, to publish the opinion, to certify the case to the Attorney General of Virginia under Fed. R.App. P. 44, to vacate a prior order from this Court, and to object to the admissibility of a docket sheet into evidence

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 F.3d 1065, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendall-h-breedlove-v-james-r-hart-calvin-w-philli-ca4-1995.