Ken Kinsey, Inc. v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ken Kinsey, Inc. v. Robinson

236 A.D.2d 895, 654 N.Y.S.2d 701, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1939

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion for leave to file and serve an amended complaint alleging a cause of action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien (see, Hempstead Concrete Corp. v Elite Assocs., 203 AD2d 521). Leave to amend a pleading shall be freely given (CPLR 3025 [b]; Fahey v County of Ontario, 44 NY2d 934), and defendant will not suffer any surprise or prejudice by the amendment (see, Ross v Markham, 175 AD2d 590). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga [896] County, Hayes, J.—Amend Complaint.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion for leave to file and serve an amended complaint alleging a cause of action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien (see, Hempstead Concrete Corp. v Elite Assocs., 203 AD2d 521). Leave to amend a pleading shall be freely given (CPLR 3025 [b]; Fahey v County of Ontario, 44 NY2d 934), and defendant will not suffer any surprise or prejudice by the amendment (see, Ross v Markham, 175 AD2d 590). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga [896] County, Hayes, J.—Amend Complaint.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Ken Kinsey, Inc. v. Robinson, 236 A.D.2d 895, 654 N.Y.S.2d 701, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

236 A.D.2d 895 (Ken Kinsey, Inc. v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related