Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Ken Kinsey, Inc. v. Robinson

Ken Kinsey, Inc. v. Robinson

236 A.D.2d 895, 654 N.Y.S.2d 701, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1939
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 A.D.2d 895 (Ken Kinsey, Inc. v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ken Kinsey, Inc. v. Robinson, 236 A.D.2d 895, 654 N.Y.S.2d 701, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion for leave to file and serve an amended complaint alleging a cause of action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien (see, Hempstead Concrete Corp. v Elite Assocs., 203 AD2d 521). Leave to amend a pleading shall be freely given (CPLR 3025 [b]; Fahey v County of Ontario, 44 NY2d 934), and defendant will not suffer any surprise or prejudice by the amendment (see, Ross v Markham, 175 AD2d 590). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga [896]*896County, Hayes, J.—Amend Complaint.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ARG Trucking Corp. v. Amerimart Development Co.
302 A.D.2d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.D.2d 895, 654 N.Y.S.2d 701, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ken-kinsey-inc-v-robinson-nyappdiv-1997.