Kemper v. Michigan Millers Mut. Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court

Kemper v. Michigan Millers Mut. Ins.

93 Ohio St. 3d 1317

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 21, 2001

Docket01-1709

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1317 (Kemper v. Michigan Millers Mut. Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kemper v. Michigan Millers Mut. Ins., 93 Ohio St. 3d 1317 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Certified State Law Question, No. 300CV07799. On review of preliminary memoranda. The certified questions are as follows:

“1. Are the requirements of Linko v. Indemnity Ins. Co., 90 Ohio St.3d 565 (2000), relative to an offer of UM/UIM coverage, applicable to a policy of insurance written after enactment of HB 261 and before SB 97?

“2. If the Linko requirements are applicable, does, under HB 261, a signed rejection act as an effective declination of UM/UIM coverage, where there is no other evidence, oral or documentary, of an offer of coverage?”

The court declines to answer the certified questions, and this cause is dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI