Kemper v. Clarite Battery, Inc.
This text of 272 P.2d 194 (Kemper v. Clarite Battery, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The material facts of this case are substantially the same as those of Bunting Tractor Co., Inc. v. Emmett D. Ford Contractors, Inc., 2 Utah 2d 275, 272 P.2d 191, published above, except that defendant had not filed its cost bond before the motion to dismiss was made but proffered one immediately thereafter. In this case the trial court dismissed the action “without prejudice.”
Defendant here urges that the dismissal should have been “with prejudice” on the basis of the same rationale as set forth in the Bunting case. For the reasons stated [281]*281therein we are of the opinion that Judge Jeppson wisely and justly added “without prejudice” to his order of dismissal.
Affirmed. Costs to respondents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 P.2d 194, 2 Utah 2d 280, 1954 Utah LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemper-v-clarite-battery-inc-utah-1954.