Kemper-Thomas Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Kemper-Thomas Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 433

United States Customs Court·Decided May 17, 1956·No. No. 59921; protest 265787-K (Cleveland)·Published

Opinion

[434]*434Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the items in controversy consist of molds in chief value of metal, designed only for use on bending machines for shaping decorated glass pieces; that said bending machine is powered by an electric motor which is an essential part of the machine; and that the said bending machine cannot properly perform the function for which it was designed without such molds, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[434]*434Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the items in controversy consist of molds in chief value of metal, designed only for use on bending machines for shaping decorated glass pieces; that said bending machine is powered by an electric motor which is an essential part of the machine; and that the said bending machine cannot properly perform the function for which it was designed without such molds, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Kemper-Thomas Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 433 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

36 Cust. Ct. 433 (Kemper-Thomas Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.