Kemper-Thomas Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Kemper-Thomas Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 433

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 17, 1956

DocketNo. 59921; protest 265787-K (Cleveland)

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 433 (Kemper-Thomas Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kemper-Thomas Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 433 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

[434]*434Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the items in controversy consist of molds in chief value of metal, designed only for use on bending machines for shaping decorated glass pieces; that said bending machine is powered by an electric motor which is an essential part of the machine; and that the said bending machine cannot properly perform the function for which it was designed without such molds, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[434]*434Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the items in controversy consist of molds in chief value of metal, designed only for use on bending machines for shaping decorated glass pieces; that said bending machine is powered by an electric motor which is an essential part of the machine; and that the said bending machine cannot properly perform the function for which it was designed without such molds, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Cust. Ct. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemper-thomas-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.