Kempczinski v. . Chelsea Fibre Mills
109 N.E. 1080, 215 N.Y. 681, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1111
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Ctjddeback, Hogan, Miller and Seabury, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kempczinski v. . Chelsea Fibre Mills, 109 N.E. 1080, 215 N.Y. 681, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1111 (N.Y. 1915).
109 N.E. 1080 (Kempczinski v. . Chelsea Fibre Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.