Kemp v. State

261 S.W.2d 573, 159 Tex. Crim. 110, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1799
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 28, 1953
Docket26535
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 261 S.W.2d 573 (Kemp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kemp v. State, 261 S.W.2d 573, 159 Tex. Crim. 110, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1799 (Tex. 1953).

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

Upon a plea of guilty before the court, a jury being waived, appellant was adjudged guilty of the offense of rape.

The judgment alone recites the punishment fixed by the court. It is as follows, . . that he be punished by confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of not less than Five (5) nor more than Ten (10) years.”

Such a judgment is indefinite and uncertain as to the punishment assessed and, there being no verdict, is void under the rule announced in Ex parte Traxler, 147 Tex. Cr. Rep. 661, 184 S.W. 2d 286; Edwards v. State, 153 Tex. Cr. Rep. 301, 219 S.W. 2d 1022; Ex parte East, 154 Tex. Cr. Rep. 123, 225 S. W. 2d 833.

The indictment charges the offense of rape and it was to this charge that appellant pleaded guilty and was permitted to waive a jury.

The offense of rape may be punished by death and therefore, under the express provisions of Art. 47 P.C., is a capital felony.

Art. 10(a) V.A.C.C.P. provides for the waiver of a jury only *111 “in a criminal prosecution for any offense classified as a felony less than a capital offense.”

Art. 12 V.A.C.C.P. provides that no person can be convicted of a felony except upon the verdict of a jury duly rendered and recorded unless in felony cases less than capital a jury has been waived as provided in Art. 10(a) V.A.C.C.P.

The conviction without a jury verdict in a capital case, in violation of the statutes mentioned, cannot be upheld.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clemons v. State
676 S.W.2d 356 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Ex Parte Adams
383 S.W.2d 596 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
State ex rel. Nicholson v. Boles
134 S.E.2d 576 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1964)
State v. Boles
134 S.E.2d 576 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1964)
Ex parte Sparks
372 S.W.2d 697 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1963)
Benge v. State
330 S.W.2d 195 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Ex parte Donahoo
166 Tex. Crim. 625 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1958)
Villarreal v. State
317 S.W.2d 531 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1958)
Houston v. State
287 S.W.2d 643 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)
Ex Parte Padgett
278 S.W.2d 865 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Ex Parte Kelley
277 S.W.2d 111 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 S.W.2d 573, 159 Tex. Crim. 110, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemp-v-state-texcrimapp-1953.