Kemp v. State

518 S.W.3d 296, 2017 WL 2332747, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 524
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 30, 2017
DocketWD 78981
StatusPublished

This text of 518 S.W.3d 296 (Kemp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kemp v. State, 518 S.W.3d 296, 2017 WL 2332747, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 524 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Lamont Kemp appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. The motion court rejected Kemp’s argument, finding his allegation “that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him of the deadline for the State’s guilty plea offer ... is without merit.” Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
518 S.W.3d 296, 2017 WL 2332747, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemp-v-state-moctapp-2017.