Kemp v. State

276 S.W.3d 860, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 57, 2009 WL 580235
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 13, 2009·No. WD 68903·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Lamont Kemp appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He was convicted by a jury of felonious restraint and unlawful use of a weapon. Kemp asserts the motion court erred in denying relief on his Rule 29.15 motion because trial counsel failed to introduce into evidence a notarized statement made by the victim.

As a published opinion in this case would be without precedential value, a memorandum explaining the court’s reasoning has been provided to the parties. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kemp v. State, 276 S.W.3d 860, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 57, 2009 WL 580235 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

276 S.W.3d 860 (Kemp v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lowery
276 S.W.3d 860 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)