Kemp v. State
This text of 276 S.W.3d 860 (Kemp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order
Lamont Kemp appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He was convicted by a jury of felonious restraint and unlawful use of a weapon. Kemp asserts the motion court erred in denying relief on his Rule 29.15 motion because trial counsel failed to introduce into evidence a notarized statement made by the victim.
As a published opinion in this case would be without precedential value, a memorandum explaining the court’s reasoning has been provided to the parties. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 S.W.3d 860, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 57, 2009 WL 580235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemp-v-state-moctapp-2009.