Kemp v. Martin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kemp v. Martin

356 S.W.3d 292, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1432, 2011 WL 5187318

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 1, 2011·No. ED 95584·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Susan Kemp appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Eric M. Martin. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Susan Kemp appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Eric M. Martin. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Kemp v. Martin, 356 S.W.3d 292, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1432, 2011 WL 5187318 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

356 S.W.3d 292 (Kemp v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.