Kemp v. Brown

Supreme Court of Georgia

Kemp v. Brown

193 S.E. 344, 184 Ga. 764, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 635

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 15, 1937

DocketNo. 11865

StatusPublished

This text of 193 S.E. 344 (Kemp v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kemp v. Brown, 193 S.E. 344, 184 Ga. 764, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 635 (Ga. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

This case came before the entire court for adjudication. The question before the court was whether the judgment of the trial court should be reversed or affirmed. Upon this question the court was equally divided, Chief Justice Russell, Presiding Justice Atkinson, and Justice Bell being in favor of reversal, and Justices Hutcheson, Jenkins, and Grice being in favor of .affirmance. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed by operation of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case came before the entire court for adjudication. The question before the court was whether the judgment of the trial court should be reversed or affirmed. Upon this question the court was equally divided, Chief Justice Russell, Presiding Justice Atkinson, and Justice Bell being in favor of reversal, and Justices Hutcheson, Jenkins, and Grice being in favor of .affirmance. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed by operation of law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 S.E. 344, 184 Ga. 764, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemp-v-brown-ga-1937.