Kemp v. Brown

Supreme Court of Georgia

Kemp v. Brown

193 S.E. 344, 184 Ga. 764, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 635

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 15, 1937·No. No. 11865·Published

Opinion

This case came before the entire court for adjudication. The question before the court was whether the judgment of the trial court should be reversed or affirmed. Upon this question the court was equally divided, Chief Justice Russell, Presiding Justice Atkinson, and Justice Bell being in favor of reversal, and Justices Hutcheson, Jenkins, and Grice being in favor of .affirmance. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed by operation of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case came before the entire court for adjudication. The question before the court was whether the judgment of the trial court should be reversed or affirmed. Upon this question the court was equally divided, Chief Justice Russell, Presiding Justice Atkinson, and Justice Bell being in favor of reversal, and Justices Hutcheson, Jenkins, and Grice being in favor of .affirmance. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed by operation of law.

Kemp v. Brown, 193 S.E. 344, 184 Ga. 764, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 635 (Ga. 1937).

Pincite

193 S.E. 344 (Kemp v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.