Kemp v. 14051 MANCHESTER, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kemp v. 14051 MANCHESTER, INC.

332 S.W.3d 273, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 12, 2011 WL 92167

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 11, 2011

DocketED 94873

StatusPublished

This text of 332 S.W.3d 273 (Kemp v. 14051 MANCHESTER, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kemp v. 14051 MANCHESTER, INC., 332 S.W.3d 273, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 12, 2011 WL 92167 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barbara Kemp appeals the trial court’s ruling that her claim against 14057 Manchester, Inc. was barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barbara Kemp appeals the trial court’s ruling that her claim against 14057 Manchester, Inc. was barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

332 S.W.3d 273, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 12, 2011 WL 92167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemp-v-14051-manchester-inc-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack