Kemp Dubea, Sun Valley Enterprises, Inc., Bettye Estilette and Gene Estilette v. Curtis Crane

Court of Appeals of Texas

Kemp Dubea, Sun Valley Enterprises, Inc., Bettye Estilette and Gene Estilette v. Curtis Crane

DecidedApril 17, 2008

Docket13-07-00474-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Kemp Dubea, Sun Valley Enterprises, Inc., Bettye Estilette and Gene Estilette v. Curtis Crane (Kemp Dubea, Sun Valley Enterprises, Inc., Bettye Estilette and Gene Estilette v. Curtis Crane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kemp Dubea, Sun Valley Enterprises, Inc., Bettye Estilette and Gene Estilette v. Curtis Crane, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-07-00474-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

KEMP DUBEA, SUN VALLEY ENTERPRISES, INC.,

BETTYE ESTILETTE, AND GENE ESTILETTE, Appellants,

v.

CURTIS CRANE , Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Kemp Dubea, Sun Valley Enterprises, Inc., Bettye Estilette, and Gene Estilette, appealed a judgment rendered against them in the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. On September 13, 2007, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on August 17, 2007, and that the deputy district clerk, Laura Cisneros, had notified this Court that appellants failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellants regarding this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. On August 17, 2007, the Clerk had similarly notified appellants regarding their failure to make payment arrangements for the reporter's record in this cause. Appellants failed to respond to the Court's notices.

The Court, having considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 17th day of April, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-07-00474-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

KEMP DUBEA, SUN VALLEY ENTERPRISES, INC.,

BETTYE ESTILETTE, AND GENE ESTILETTE, Appellants,

v.

CURTIS CRANE , Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Kemp Dubea, Sun Valley Enterprises, Inc., Bettye Estilette, and Gene Estilette, appealed a judgment rendered against them in the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. On September 13, 2007, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on August 17, 2007, and that the deputy district clerk, Laura Cisneros, had notified this Court that appellants failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellants regarding this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. On August 17, 2007, the Clerk had similarly notified appellants regarding their failure to make payment arrangements for the reporter's record in this cause. Appellants failed to respond to the Court's notices.

The Court, having considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 17th day of April, 2008.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Kemp Dubea, Sun Valley Enterprises, Inc., Bettye Estilette and Gene Estilette v. Curtis Crane, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemp-dubea-sun-valley-enterprises-inc-bettye-estil-texapp-2008.