Kemiel Obryan Downer v. State
This text of Kemiel Obryan Downer v. State (Kemiel Obryan Downer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ August 03, 2022
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A22A1425. KEMIEL OBRYAN DOWNER v. THE STATE.
In November 2018, Kemiel Obryan Downer, while represented by counsel, was convicted of two counts of aggravated assault. Downer’s trial counsel filed a timely motion for new trial. Thereafter, Downer obtained new counsel, who filed an amended motion for new trial. The trial court entered a written order denying the motion for new trial on January 10, 2022. Downer filed a pro se notice of appeal on February 7, 2022. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. “A criminal defendant in Georgia does not have the right to represent himself and also be represented by an attorney, and pro se filings by represented parties are therefore unauthorized and without effect.” Tolbert v. Toole, 296 Ga. 357, 363 (3) (767 SE2d 24) (2014) (punctuation omitted). Here, the record shows that Downer was represented by counsel at the time the trial court entered its order denying his motion for new trial, and nothing in the record indicates that counsel either withdrew or was relieved from representing Downer. See White v. State, 302 Ga. 315, 319 (2) (806 SE2d 489) (2017) (rejecting defendant’s argument that representation terminates upon entry of judgment and recognizing that a defense counsel’s duties toward a client extend for at least the 30 days after the entry of judgment when a notice of appeal may be filed). Under these circumstances, Downer’s pro se notice of appeal is a legal nullity and must be dismissed. See Soberanis v. State, 345 Ga. App. 403, 405 (812 SE2d 800) (2018). Accordingly, the State’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/03/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kemiel Obryan Downer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemiel-obryan-downer-v-state-gactapp-2022.