Kemen Sausage, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Kemen Sausage, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin

208 N.W.2d 448, 59 Wis. 2d 511, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1443

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedJune 29, 1973

DocketNo. 348

StatusPublished

This text of 208 N.W.2d 448 (Kemen Sausage, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kemen Sausage, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin, 208 N.W.2d 448, 59 Wis. 2d 511, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1443 (Wis. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for summary judgment by the defendant insurance company. The plaintiff’s complaint is based upon an alleged breach of the defendant’s duty of good faith action to protect the interest of its insured. The defendant insured a truck owned by the plaintiff which was involved in an accident with another vehicle while being driven by one of the plaintiff’s employees. The driver of the other vehicle sued the plaintiff, the defendant,-and the plaintiff’s employee for personal injuries. After a jury verdict for $250,000, the case was settled for $120,000. Policy limits were $100,000. The plaintiff’s complaint is for the $20,000 which it had to pay toward the settlement.

[512]*512We have reiterated the specific duties that an insurer owes to its insured in Howard v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co., 60 Wis. 2d 224, 208 N. W. 2d 442. One of those duties is to keep the insured timely and adequately informed of offers of settlement in the progress of settlement negotiations. The plaintiff in this case claims a breach of that duty. The trial judge ruled that there was a credibility issue which precluded him from deciding the case on the affidavits presented. This was not an abuse of his discretion.

The order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for summary judgment by the defendant insurance company. The plaintiff’s complaint is based upon an alleged breach of the defendant’s duty of good faith action to protect the interest of its insured. The defendant insured a truck owned by the plaintiff which was involved in an accident with another vehicle while being driven by one of the plaintiff’s employees. The driver of the other vehicle sued the plaintiff, the defendant,-and the plaintiff’s employee for personal injuries. After a jury verdict for $250,000, the case was settled for $120,000. Policy limits were $100,000. The plaintiff’s complaint is for the $20,000 which it had to pay toward the settlement.

[512]*512We have reiterated the specific duties that an insurer owes to its insured in Howard v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co., 60 Wis. 2d 224, 208 N. W. 2d 442. One of those duties is to keep the insured timely and adequately informed of offers of settlement in the progress of settlement negotiations. The plaintiff in this case claims a breach of that duty. The trial judge ruled that there was a credibility issue which precluded him from deciding the case on the affidavits presented. This was not an abuse of his discretion.

The order is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 N.W.2d 448, 59 Wis. 2d 511, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemen-sausage-inc-v-general-casualty-co-of-wisconsin-wis-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack