Kembo v. Holder
This text of Kembo v. Holder (Kembo v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2007
DAVID ALBERT TAPOLO KEMBO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: February 10, 2009 Decided: March 10, 2009
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Albert Tapolo Kembo, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel Eric Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Yamileth G. HandUber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; George William Maugans, III, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
David Albert Tapolo Kembo, a native and citizen of
Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of
adjustment of status and voluntary departure as a matter of
discretion. We have considered Kembo’s arguments, and find that
we are without jurisdiction to review the Board’s affirmance of
these discretionary determinations. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(a)(2)(B) (2006); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(f) (2006). We
accordingly dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kembo v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kembo-v-holder-ca4-2009.