Kemble v. Roth-Schenker Corp.
This text of 281 A.D. 955 (Kemble v. Roth-Schenker Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— -The hole into which plaintiff’s leg plunged was, according to his testimony, full of mud and water. It was evidently not discoverable as a hole at the time, anti there was no showing as to how long it had existed or that it had existed for a sufficient length of time that, in the exercise of reasonable care, the defendant should have learned of the condition. Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant, and judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the appellant dismissing the complaint herein, with costs. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 955, 120 N.Y.S.2d 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemble-v-roth-schenker-corp-nyappdiv-1953.