Kemble v. Roth-Schenker Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kemble v. Roth-Schenker Corp.

281 A.D. 955, 120 N.Y.S.2d 268

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 1953·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— -The hole into which plaintiff’s leg plunged was, according to his testimony, full of mud and water. It was evidently not discoverable as a hole at the time, anti there was no showing as to how long it had existed or that it had existed for a sufficient length of time that, in the exercise of reasonable care, the defendant should have learned of the condition. Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant, and judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the appellant dismissing the complaint herein, with costs. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— -The hole into which plaintiff’s leg plunged was, according to his testimony, full of mud and water. It was evidently not discoverable as a hole at the time, anti there was no showing as to how long it had existed or that it had existed for a sufficient length of time that, in the exercise of reasonable care, the defendant should have learned of the condition. Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant, and judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the appellant dismissing the complaint herein, with costs. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Kemble v. Roth-Schenker Corp., 281 A.D. 955, 120 N.Y.S.2d 268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

281 A.D. 955 (Kemble v. Roth-Schenker Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related