KEM Resources, LP v. Ryvamat, Inc.
This text of KEM Resources, LP v. Ryvamat, Inc. (KEM Resources, LP v. Ryvamat, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
KEM RESOURCES, LP : No. 349 MAL 2022 : : v. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court : DEER PARK LUMBER, INC., RYVAMAT, : INC., RYAN A. ANDREWS; MATTHEW R. : ANDREWS; VANESSA K. DIMEOLO; : RONALD A. ANDREWS; CITRUS ENERGY : CORPORATION : : : PETITION OF: RYVAMAT, INC. :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner is:
Did the lower court err as a matter of law in holding that KEM’s accounting claim is subject to a six-year statute of limitations, which is a matter of first impression, and based its opinion, in part, on a statutory cause of action not pled or argued by KEM?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
KEM Resources, LP v. Ryvamat, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kem-resources-lp-v-ryvamat-inc-pa-2023.