Kelvin Williams v. Dun Transportation & Stringing Inc et al

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana
DecidedMarch 16, 2026
Docket5:25-cv-02101
StatusUnknown

This text of Kelvin Williams v. Dun Transportation & Stringing Inc et al (Kelvin Williams v. Dun Transportation & Stringing Inc et al) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelvin Williams v. Dun Transportation & Stringing Inc et al, (W.D. La. 2026).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION KELVIN WILLIAMS CIVIL ACTION NO. 25-cv-2101 VERSUS JUDGE VAN HOOK DUN TRANSPORTATION & STRINGING MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY INC ET AL

MEMORANDUM ORDER The Motion to Intervene (Doc. 13) is denied without prejudice. The law is clear that the amount in controversy in an intervention must exceed $75,000. Griffin v. Lee, 621 F.3d 380 (Sth Cir. 2010); Sharpley v. Covenant Testing, 2024 WL 5083750 (W.D. La. 2024) (Hornsby, M.J.). The motion may be refiled if movant can show that the amount in controversy in the intervention exceeds $75,000. THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Shreveport, Louisiana, this 16" day of March, 2026. rAd; Mark Hornsby U.S. Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffin v. Lee
621 F.3d 380 (Fifth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kelvin Williams v. Dun Transportation & Stringing Inc et al, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelvin-williams-v-dun-transportation-stringing-inc-et-al-lawd-2026.