Kelvin Settle v. United States

Eighth Circuit

Kelvin Settle v. United States

498 F. App'x 665

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 19, 2013·No. 12-3277·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Kelvin Settle appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his motion for return of property and denial of his motion to sanction the government. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no basis for reversal. See 18 U.S.C. § 983(e)(1) (requirements for granting motion to set aside declaration of forfeiture include that moving party did not know or have reason to know of seizure within suf-fieient time to file timely claim); 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (false-statement offense and penalties do not apply to party to judicial proceeding). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion.

1

. The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Kelvin Settle appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his motion for return of property and denial of his motion to sanction the government. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no basis for reversal. See 18 U.S.C. § 983(e)(1) (requirements for granting motion to set aside declaration of forfeiture include that moving party did not know or have reason to know of seizure within suf-fieient time to file timely claim); 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (false-statement offense and penalties do not apply to party to judicial proceeding). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion.

1

. The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Kelvin Settle v. United States, 498 F. App'x 665 (8th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

498 F. App'x 665 (Kelvin Settle v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related