Kelvin Settle v. United States
This text of 498 F. App'x 665 (Kelvin Settle v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Federal inmate Kelvin Settle appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his motion for return of property and denial of his motion to sanction the government. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no basis for reversal. See 18 U.S.C. § 983(e)(1) (requirements for granting motion to set aside declaration of forfeiture include that moving party did not know or have reason to know of seizure within suf-fieient time to file timely claim); 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (false-statement offense and penalties do not apply to party to judicial proceeding). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion.
. The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
498 F. App'x 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelvin-settle-v-united-states-ca8-2013.