Kelvin Ray Love v. L. Andrews
This text of 8 F. App'x 602 (Kelvin Ray Love v. L. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Arkansas prisoner Kelvin Love appeals from the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Love argues the district court erred when it dismissed his complaint without issuing a summons and allowing him to amend his complaint after he had paid the initial partial filing fee. However, the district court may at any time dismiss a case for failure to state a claim, “[notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid” see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and need not allow a prisoner to amend his complaint prior to dismissal, see Christiansen v. Clarke, 147 F.3d 655, 658 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1023, 119 S.Ct. 554, 142 L.Ed.2d 461 (1998). Upon de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam), we agree that Love’s complaint failed to allege a constitutional violation.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 F. App'x 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelvin-ray-love-v-l-andrews-ca8-2001.