Kelvin & Hughes American Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Kelvin & Hughes American Corp. v. United States

50 Cust. Ct. 208, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4070

United States Customs Court·Decided February 14, 1963·No. No. 67440; protest 62/5251 (Baltimore)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal scale expanders, having essential electrical features, designed for use as optional accessories for the purpose of enlarging the visual presentation of information being received from echo-sounding apparatus, and which are not essential to the efficient operation of such apparatus, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal scale expanders, having essential electrical features, designed for use as optional accessories for the purpose of enlarging the visual presentation of information being received from echo-sounding apparatus, and which are not essential to the efficient operation of such apparatus, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Kelvin & Hughes American Corp. v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 208, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4070 (cusc 1963).

Pincite

50 Cust. Ct. 208 (Kelvin & Hughes American Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.