Kelvey v. Tull

182 A. 894, 119 N.J. Eq. 536, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 652

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Davis.

For affirmance —The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

For reversal —None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelvey v. Tull, 182 A. 894, 119 N.J. Eq. 536, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 652 (N.J. 1936).

Pincite

182 A. 894 (Kelvey v. Tull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.