Kelson v. Department of Navy

Fourth Circuit

Kelson v. Department of Navy

568 F. App'x 217

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 24, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2487

StatusPublished

This text of 568 F. App'x 217 (Kelson v. Department of Navy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelson v. Department of Navy, 568 F. App'x 217 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rhonna M. Kelson appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelson v. Dep’t of the Navy, No. 7:13-cv-00022-D, 2013 WL 6058205 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Rhonna M. Kelson appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelson v. Dep’t of the Navy, No. 7:13-cv-00022-D, 2013 WL 6058205 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 F. App'x 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelson-v-department-of-navy-ca4-2014.