Kelso v. Ely

Supreme Court of Iowa

Kelso v. Ely

11 Iowa 501

Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided April 15, 1861·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Baldwin, J.

No exceptions were taken to the special [502] finding of the court upon the evidence. The plaintiff appeals from the conclusion of the court upon the evidence, and asks this court to say that such finding was wrong. No motion for a new trial was made so as to bring the errors assigned before us for our determination. Upon the authority of Pace v. Warner, 10 Iowa 391, this judgment should be affirmed. See also Corneo Co. v. Gaston, Ib. 512.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin, J.

No exceptions were taken to the special [502] finding of the court upon the evidence. The plaintiff appeals from the conclusion of the court upon the evidence, and asks this court to say that such finding was wrong. No motion for a new trial was made so as to bring the errors assigned before us for our determination. Upon the authority of Pace v. Warner, 10 Iowa 391, this judgment should be affirmed. See also Corneo Co. v. Gaston, Ib. 512.

Affirmed.

Kelso v. Ely, 11 Iowa 501 (iowa 1861).

Pincite

11 Iowa 501 (Kelso v. Ely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related