Kelso v. Cuming

1 Redf. 392
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1863
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Redf. 392 (Kelso v. Cuming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelso v. Cuming, 1 Redf. 392 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1863).

Opinion

The Sderogate. — I. The fee of the real estate vested under the will in the intestate as a present gift, subject to the life estate of his father.

II. The rents due and collected by the guardian, during the lifetime of the intestate, belonged to the intestate. But rents collected February 1st, 1860, after the death of the intestate, go with the fee to Mrs. Kelso.

III. The balance of the proceeds of the personal estate ($2,053.21), having come from the intestate’s mother and her relatives, goes to Mrs. Kelso, either as next of kin of the mother or by the will.

The interest on the balance of rents paid to the administrator by the guardian, and belonging to the intestate’s estate, is to be accounted for. The said balance ($8,212.06) and the interest ($1,734.45), are assets in the hands of the administrator, to be divided among the three next of kin.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Markham v. Hufford
48 L.R.A. 580 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Redf. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelso-v-cuming-nysurct-1863.