Kelsey v. Walls
This text of 55 Misc. 392 (Kelsey v. Walls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Treating the complaint as one which sets forth a trespass, merely, a cause of action at law is apparent; and, since the averments are all consistent with the demand for damages without resort to equity to fix the amount — as upon an accounting — the pleading is not open to demurrer, notwithstanding that equitable relief is also sought. Doyle v. Delaney, 112 App. Div. 856. The rule stated in Black v. Vanderbilt, 70 App. Div. 16, relied upon by the defendant, has no application to the present case, because of the distinction noted in Doyle v. Delaney, supra.
Demurrer overruled with costs, with leave to defendant to plead over, on payment of costs within twenty days.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 Misc. 392, 106 N.Y.S. 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelsey-v-walls-nysupct-1907.