Kelsey v. Walls

55 Misc. 392, 106 N.Y.S. 575
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1907
StatusPublished

This text of 55 Misc. 392 (Kelsey v. Walls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelsey v. Walls, 55 Misc. 392, 106 N.Y.S. 575 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1907).

Opinion

Bischoff, J.

Treating the complaint as one which sets forth a trespass, merely, a cause of action at law is apparent; and, since the averments are all consistent with the demand for damages without resort to equity to fix the amount — as upon an accounting — the pleading is not open to demurrer, notwithstanding that equitable relief is also sought. Doyle v. Delaney, 112 App. Div. 856. The rule stated in Black v. Vanderbilt, 70 App. Div. 16, relied upon by the defendant, has no application to the present case, because of the distinction noted in Doyle v. Delaney, supra.

Demurrer overruled with costs, with leave to defendant to plead over, on payment of costs within twenty days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Black v. Vanderbilt
70 A.D. 16 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Doyle v. Delaney
112 A.D. 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 Misc. 392, 106 N.Y.S. 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelsey-v-walls-nysupct-1907.