Kelsey v. Hourigan
Opinion
| Kelsey v Hourigan |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 06259 |
| Decided on August 22, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on August 22, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
473 CA 18-01954
v
GERALD E. HOURIGAN, JR., INDIVIDUALLY, AND DOING BUSINESS AS GERALD HOURIGAN DAIRY FARM, PATRICIA J. HOURIGAN, GERALD E. HOURIGAN, JR., AND PATRICIA J. HOURIGAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS HOURIGAN'S UDDER PLACE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
COSTELLO, COONEY & FEARON, PLLC, CAMILLUS (JAMES GASCON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
JOHN A. MAYA, UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered October 11, 2018. The order denied defendants' motion for leave to renew and reargue their motion for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Kelsey v Hourigan ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Aug. 22, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).
Entered: August 22, 2019
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2019 NY Slip Op 6259 (Kelsey v. Hourigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.